Corporations Need A Strategy For Their Philanthropic Efforts Too
For the past few months, I’ve been playing with the idea of becoming the leader of a million $ corporation and what it would be like. One of the the main points I get stuck on is why corporations don’t focus their [philanthropic] money on something that will get them [and society as a whole] tangible results.
I wondered if I was the only one who felt that corporations should hold their “beneficiaries” accountable.
Thankfully, after reading this today, I know that I’m not alone. I know companies love to show good their warm and fuzzy side by throwing money at things they’re passionate about, but it is not enough. Corporations need to have a vested interest in how their money is used by the beneficiary.
Imagine if we just had 2 big brands backing how to improve the education system in North America, funding and facilitating focus groups on how to revolutionize the system. Starbucks started taking action with small business.
We need more companies like Starbucks, taking the initiative to rebuild Western society and more CEO’s like Zuck to be committed to situations that America needs to address. But like I said, that’s not enough, we need business and innovation leaders to put not even half of the effort they put into running their business into running these initiatives (i.e. rebuilding education).
If we had that, we could reign at the top for decades to come.
And help millions doing it.
Hi there, You have done an incredible job. I’ll definitely digg it and individually recommend to my friends. I’m confident they will be benefited from this website.
Shalanda Schulter
8:28 pm
29/02/2012
Thank you very much for the kind words Shalanda. I’m glad I can help!
Radz
4:14 am
01/03/2012
Thanks for helping out, great info .
Adalberto Muehlman
9:01 am
10/03/2012
I like this post, enjoyed this one thanks for posting .
game of thrones
2:18 pm
13/03/2012
I like this post, enjoyed this one appreciate it for putting up.
Curtis
10:57 pm
17/03/2012